# Demo — Kill Chain Explorer

The air-threat kill chain is the backbone of the whole course: Detect → Track → Identify → Engage → Kill. Survivability means breaking one of those links, and every EW technique is a tool aimed at a specific link. This demo lets you walk the chain, see which survivability disciplines attack each link, and then test yourself on the ES / EP / EA classification.

## The framework

Each link depends on the one before it. Break any single link and the engagement fails:

$$
\text{Detect} \to \text{Track} \to \text{Identify} \to \text{Engage} \to \text{Kill}
$$

Activity in the spectrum is organized into **Electronic Support (ES)** — sensing and characterizing emissions; **Electronic Protection (EP)** — defending your own use of the spectrum; and **Electronic Attack (EA)** — degrading, denying, or deceiving the enemy's use of it.

## Interactive demo

<a class="demo-fullscreen" href="../_static/demos/KillChainExplorer.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Open in full screen</a>

<div class="demo-wrap">
<iframe src="../_static/demos/KillChainExplorer.html"
        title="Interactive Kill Chain Explorer"
        width="100%"
        loading="lazy">
</iframe>
</div>

## Walkthrough

1. **Click the Detect box.** Read which disciplines break this link — low-observable shaping, standoff jamming, emission control. Notice that Detect is where stealth has the most leverage (the fourth-power law from the reading).
2. **Step through Track, Identify, Engage, Kill.** Each side panel lists the disciplines and a few example tactics. Watch how the toolkit shifts from signature reduction (early links) to deception and hard-kill defenses (late links).
3. **Note the Kill box is red.** It is the outcome to prevent — every technique upstream exists to keep the chain from reaching it.
4. **Play the classification mini-game.** A tactic appears ("RWR alerts crew to SAM lock"). Choose ES, EP, or EA. The score tracks correct vs. attempted across ~10 scenarios.
5. **Get one wrong on purpose.** Read the explanation. The classification is about the *function* (listen / defend / attack), not the hardware.

## Key observations

- **The chain is sequential.** You do not have to defeat the whole IADS — break the cheapest link at the place and time that matters.
- **One system, multiple roles.** An RWR (ES) that cues a jammer (EA) is the canonical pairing; classification describes function, not the box.
- **Detect is special.** Because detection gates everything downstream and obeys the fourth-power law, it rewards investment more than any other link.

## Source

<a class="matlab-link" href="../_static/downloads/ECE%20495%20EW%20%E2%80%93%20Code.zip#code/L1_FourthPowerLaw.m" download><svg viewBox="0 0 22 22" width="14" height="14" aria-hidden="true" style="vertical-align:-2px;margin-right:6px;"><rect width="22" height="22" rx="3" fill="#e87722"/><text x="11" y="15.5" text-anchor="middle" font-family="'Inter',sans-serif" font-size="9" font-weight="800" fill="#fff" letter-spacing="-0.04em">MAT</text></svg><span class="ml-text">MATLAB · code/L1_FourthPowerLaw.m</span><span class="ml-arrow">↓</span></a>

The in-class type-along script plots the fourth-power law $R_\text{max} = K\,\sigma^{1/4}$ and confirms that a 12 dB RCS reduction halves the detection range.
