# Lesson 18 Flashcards

Click a question to reveal the answer.

<div data-flashcards data-deck="b2l18"></div>

<details>
<summary><strong>1. How does deception jamming differ from noise jamming?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>Noise jamming attacks the power budget — it raises the threat's noise floor until the real echo drowns (it shouts). Deception attacks the measurement — it puts a plausible false return where the target is not, so the radar tracks a lie. Noise denies the picture; deception paints a fake one.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>2. What are a tracker's "bins," and how does each jamming type abuse them?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>Bins are the cells a tracker keeps books in — a range cell, a Doppler cell, an angle cell. Noise <em>masks</em> a bin by burying it in energy; deception <em>fills</em> or <em>shifts</em> it with a false but believable return. Win the bin and you own what the radar thinks is true.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>3. What is DRFM and what does it do?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>Digital RF Memory: a jammer that captures the threat's incoming pulse, digitizes and stores it, then retransmits modified copies under software control — setting precise delay, Doppler, and amplitude and replicating pulses to build false returns that look real.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>4. Why is a DRFM false return so hard to tell from a real echo?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>It is a phase-coherent replica of the radar's own transmitted waveform, so it passes the radar's matched filter with full processing gain. The lie earns the radar's own gain — it comes through as cleanly and as loud as (or louder than) the real skin return.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>5. How does a DRFM repeater differ from a plain transponder?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>A transponder replies after a fixed delay — one crude range-false target, and non-coherent, so it is easy to flag. A DRFM stores a phase-coherent copy and replays it with precise, programmable delay, Doppler, amplitude, and replication, making believable false returns.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>6. What is false-target injection, and why does it work?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>Replaying the captured pulse at several delays/Doppler shifts to fill the range-Doppler map with believable replicas. A search radar drowns in plausible contacts (which is real?), and a tracker can be seduced into locking the wrong, brighter return.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>7. Walk through the three steps of range-gate pull-off (RGPO).</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>(1) <strong>Cover pulse</strong> — a louder copy sits on the real return and captures the gate (the gate locks the jammer). (2) <strong>Ramp the delay</strong> — the false return walks out in range, dragging the gate with it off the target. (3) <strong>Blink off</strong> — the gate coasts on empty space while the true target, left behind, has escaped.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>8. How much range pull-off does an added DRFM delay buy?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>Apparent range shifts by <span class="math notranslate nohighlight">\(\Delta R = c\,\Delta t / 2\)</span> — the two-way factor, since the signal travels out and back. A <span class="math notranslate nohighlight">\(1\ \mu\text{s}\)</span> added delay walks the gate <span class="math notranslate nohighlight">\(150\ \text{m}\)</span> off the target.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>9. What is velocity-gate pull-off (VGPO)?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>RGPO's twin in the Doppler bin: start the false return at the target's true Doppler, then ramp a programmed frequency shift so the apparent velocity walks away, dragging the velocity gate off the target before blinking off. Run with RGPO, the false return pulls a range-Doppler diagonal.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>10. How does inverse-gain angle deception fool a monopulse radar?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>A monopulse radar reads angle error from its <span class="math notranslate nohighlight">\(\Delta/\Sigma\)</span> (difference-over-sum) ratio. Inverse-gain jamming transmits a phase-inverted <span class="math notranslate nohighlight">\(\Delta\)</span> to null that ratio, so the radar reads zero angle error and the angle track freezes or drifts off.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>11. Compare towed and expendable decoys, and why both beat chaff.</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>A towed decoy is a repeater trailed behind the aircraft — brighter and offset, it seduces the lock away. Expendable decoys (MALD, ITALD) saturate the picture, bait radars into radiating, and transfer locks. Both beat chaff: no zero-Doppler notch problem, and they look like real moving targets.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>12. Why does leading-edge tracking defeat RGPO?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>The real skin return always arrives first; the cover pulse and walked-off false return arrive after it. A radar that gates on the leading edge of the return stays glued to the true target while the pull-off slides harmlessly behind it.</p></div>
</details>

<details>
<summary><strong>13. What is the realistic payoff of deception jamming?</strong></summary>
<div class="card-answer"><p>Time and doubt — it makes the radar work harder, look the wrong way, and coast on nothing for the seconds the platform needs. It rarely kills a track permanently, because ECCM (leading-edge tracking, digital monopulse, waveform agility, polarization, fingerprint discrimination) eventually counters it.</p></div>
</details>
