L9 Pre-flight#
Block 1: Radar Fundamentals — Lesson 9: Project 1 Work Day Work this before L9. Pre-flights are never collected — in class, anyone may be cold-called to present any question at the board, and that recitation is the participation grade.
Assumed pre-class reading#
The Project 1 handout (B-21 Threat Detection Range Analysis), posted with
B21_RCS_Table.csvandL9_Project1Starter.m.L7 and L8 wrap-ups.
This quiz checks that you arrive ready to work, not that you have done the project. Read the handout before class.
Quiz questions (5 items, ~5 minutes)#
Q1. (Multiple choice) In Project 1, each threat radar computes detection range using which RCS column from the B-21 table?
[ ] (a) Always the X-band column, since LO targets fire control
[ ] (b) The column matching that radar’s own operating band
[ ] (c) The average of the three columns, as one broadband value
[ ] (d) The largest of the three columns at each aspect
Q2. (Multiple choice) The B-21’s RCS table shows higher (less suppressed) values at UHF than at X-band. The operational consequence is:
[ ] (a) The TTR detects the B-21 before the EW radar does
[ ] (b) The EW radar gives up less range to LO than the X-band layers do
[ ] (c) All three radar classes first detect the B-21 at about the same range
[ ] (d) The RCS table must be wrong, since broadband LO suppresses every band
Q3. (Multiple choice) A +3 dB error in RCS changes the computed detection range by a factor of:
[ ] (a) \(10^{3/10} \approx 2.0\)
[ ] (b) \(10^{3/20} \approx 1.4\)
[ ] (c) \(10^{3/40} \approx 1.2\)
[ ] (d) No change — RCS cancels
Q4. (Short answer) The EW radar detects the B-21 well before the TTR can. In one sentence, why does that gap matter for the kill chain — that is, why is detection not the same as engagement?
Q5. (Multiple choice) The RCS table covers aspect 0° to 180° and is symmetric about the nose–tail axis. To plot detection range over the full 360° of azimuth, you should:
[ ] (a) Set RCS to zero for aspects beyond 180°
[ ] (b) Mirror the table about the nose–tail axis
[ ] (c) Extrapolate the last few values linearly past 180°
[ ] (d) Re-run the analysis with a second table