Practice Problems (KEY)#
Convert the following numbers to engineering notation:
46500000 V → 46.5 MV
0.00000983 A → 9.83 µA
792000000000 Ω → 792 GΩ
6150 V → 6.15 kV 0.0019 A → 1.9 mA
20000000000 Ω → 20 GΩ
Use the decision matrix below to determine which laptop would be the best choice. The weights for screen size and cost will be determined in class.
Screen Size |
Cost |
|
|---|---|---|
Laptop A |
15 |
$1000 |
Laptop B |
17 |
$1200 |
Decision matrix (assume larger screen size is desired):
Laptop |
Screen Size |
Cost |
Total |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight |
Determined in Class |
Determined in Class |
|||||
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
||
A |
15 |
0.882 |
1000 |
1.000 |
|||
B |
17 |
1.000 |
1200 |
0.833 |
The weights are determined in class, so the Weighted and Total cells are intentionally left blank. Once the class has chosen weights that sum to 1.0, multiply each normalized score by its weight and add the two weighted scores for each laptop; the laptop with the highest total score is the best choice.
Determine which house would be the best choice.
Decision matrix (shorter commute time, larger square footage, and lower cost are desired):
House |
Commute Time |
Square Footage |
Cost |
Total |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight |
Determined in Class |
Determined in Class |
Determined in Class |
|||||||
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
||
A |
15 |
0.333 |
2000 |
0.667 |
$220K |
0.909 |
||||
B |
5 |
1.000 |
1500 |
0.500 |
$250K |
0.800 |
||||
C |
30 |
0.167 |
3000 |
1.000 |
$200K |
1.000 |
Part |
Ripple |
Cost |
Total |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight |
0.6 |
0.4 |
|||||
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
||
A |
30 mV |
1.000 |
0.600 |
$20 |
0.600 |
0.240 |
0.840 |
B |
35 mV |
0.857 |
0.514 |
$14 |
0.857 |
0.343 |
0.857 |
C |
45 mV |
0.667 |
0.400 |
$12 |
1.000 |
0.400 |
0.800 |
Part B is the best AC-to-DC converter because it has the highest total score.
(a) Cost and efficiency weighted equally (0.5 each):
Option |
Cost |
Efficiency |
Total |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|||||
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
||
X |
$3.2M |
0.875 |
0.438 |
99.4% |
1.000 |
0.500 |
0.938 |
Y |
$3.0M |
0.933 |
0.467 |
97.2% |
0.978 |
0.489 |
0.956 |
Z |
$2.8M |
1.000 |
0.500 |
86.0% |
0.865 |
0.433 |
0.933 |
Option Y is the best because it has the highest total score.
(b) Efficiency 9× more important than cost:
Option |
Cost |
Efficiency |
Total |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight |
0.1 |
0.9 |
|||||
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
Value |
Norm |
Weighted |
||
X |
$3.2M |
0.875 |
0.088 |
99.4% |
1.000 |
0.900 |
0.988 |
Y |
$3.0M |
0.933 |
0.093 |
97.2% |
0.978 |
0.880 |
0.973 |
Z |
$2.8M |
1.000 |
0.100 |
86.0% |
0.865 |
0.779 |
0.879 |
Option X is the best because it has the highest total score.
(a) 5.45 × 10⁻⁷ A → 545 nA
(b) 123,400 W → 123.4 kW
(c) 8.33 × 10⁷ V → 83.3 MV
(d) 4.3 × 10¹⁰ bits → 43 Gb
(e) 1,497,000 Hz → 1.497 MHz
(f) 76.2 × 10⁻⁴ m → 7.62 mm
(g) 2.31 × 10⁻⁵ m → 23.1 µm
(h) 1.78 × 10⁻¹⁴ W → 17.8 fW